March 2006:
"Steven, we really liked your column. Would you be interested in writing one for us every week? We’re thinking of calling it Sandberg On Sports..."
How could I have ever imagined the amazing future I had in store?
It seems like such a long time ago that I was sitting in my freshman dorm at Gonzaga reading those words. I had recently watched the 2006 Gonzaga Bulldogs drop a heartbreaker to UCLA in the Sweet Sixteen, and wrote a column about the mood in my dorm. I submitted it to the school paper, “The Gonzaga Bulletin,” and they liked it so much they brought me on board full-time.
At first I was just happy to be providing a different perspective within the pages of the newspaper, and wrote about things like why April is a good month for baseball, or Andre Agassi’s final match. But as I grew older and became more involved with the school, I started to use my space to highlight or comment on things that mattered to people. At the beginning of my third year, my former editor, Tim Bross, challenged me to dive in and take a stand on important topics instead of sitting on the sidelines. If something needed criticizing, then criticize it, but if something was worthy of praise, praise it. As a result, I became a better writer, because through my work after Tim’s challenge I realized that a good columnist can’t be a blatant homer or overly-critical; they just need to write how they truly feel. No gimmicks, no phoned-in topics, no attempts to stir up controversy; just write what you really mean, and mean what you say.
That column became my identity; a large part of who I was. Other students got involved with Gonzaga by joining service groups, devoting themselves to their studies, or other activities. I got involved by commenting on Gonzaga through the lens of sports, and having those thoughts printed in the student newspaper. There were always stories to tell, people who deserved recognition, or acts that should be praised or condemned, and my goal was to use my column to help the Gonzaga community by allowing it to be aware of these stories.
I thought Josh Heytvelt and Theo Davis deserved a second chance. I thought that the women’s basketball team’s response to Rachel Kane’s knee injury was inspiring. I thought that certain actions by some students in the Kennel Club were getting out of line. People may not have always agreed with me, but that’s not the point. My goal was to use my opinion in order to get others to look around and decide for themselves.
At Gonzaga, my column helped define me.
As I began this summer 2009, I hadn’t been a full-time columnist in over a year. This Web site, which had been used for republishing my columns from the Bulletin, had gone largely unused for quite some time. But as the days of summer rolled on, and my search for a television reporter job took longer and longer, I found myself feeling empty inside. As each day went by without a job offer, I became more and more frustrated. I needed something to help fill the void I was feeling during this transitional period of my life.
So that’s when I starting writing again. My columns became a blog. And I realized how much I missed doing this.
Days, weeks, and months went by without a job, but I wasn’t as disheartened as I was before, because I had devoted myself to this blog, trying to make it the best that it could be. My blog became a sanctuary for me during a time when so many things were still uncertain in my life. With every post, column, or anecdote, I was having a blast, and it was all coming back to me how important my sportswriting was to the kind of person that I am. With a sense of purpose, I pushed on, trying to write something every day, but more importantly, having fun with it all. Writing here for the past few months helped me find some peace, and was an outlet for my creativity during a time when I needed it most. I’ve had so much fun.
But sometimes life gives you a pitch you weren’t expecting: I finally found a reporter job.
I was recently hired to be a news reporter for KDRV Newswatch 12 in Medford, Ore., and I couldn’t be more excited. After months of searching, I’ve finally found a job, and I’ve finally become a reporter (for the record, it’s in NEWS, not SPORTS. You don’t know how many times I’ve had to clear that one up with friends and relatives. And yes, I do know things that aren’t sports-related). I’m going to be moving to Medford soon, and within a few months my fiancĂ© will finish her student-teaching and join me there, when my professional and personal lives will finally come together and I begin a new life.
It’s everything I’ve wanted, but with a drawback. A full-time reporting gig in a new city plus wedding plans and future marriage doesn’t leave me much time for blogging.
Unfortunately, this site is going to take a bit of a hit.
Wait! Don’t take me off your bookmarks just yet! And don’t stop checking for updates! I’m not stepping out of the game completely, but there is going to be a significant drop-off in the amount that I write. With a job and a burgeoning new life, I won’t be able to write as frequently as I used to.
Invariably in life, things change. It’s a part of growing up. For me, I’m starting a career and, soon, a family. I’m going to devote myself completely to those things. That means that other aspects of my life, including my writing for this blog, are going to change.
That being said, I want to let you know that I am determined to continue with this site, even in a small way. I may only write once a week or less, but I am still going to write. My tone, subject matter, and excitement won’t change one bit, only the frequency of my updates.
As Tom Hudson confusingly once said “I’m saying so long. But I’m still going to be around.”
So now I want to take this opportunity to say thank you to the people who helped me achieve all the success I’ve had, both in television and in sportswriting.
First, this Web site wouldn’t even be here without Travis Lucian, who encouraged me to cut costs by taking my stuff to Blogspot instead of wasting money on a domain name. I owe you big time, buddy.
To all of GUTV, for giving me the best four years of my life working in that studio. Dan Garrity, thanks for always believing in me despite all the odds. Phil Taylor, thank you so much for all of the perspective and insight you gave me when I was sitting in your office. Mike Lavelle, thanks for pushing to get more basketball games for the GUTV remote crew. And a big thanks to all of the shooters I’ve worked with, who made me look good enough to get a job. James Churchill, Nate Coombs, Sebastian Robertson, Dee Phillips, Dave Heil, Brad Gowing (WSU), Megan McGovern, and more.
To Tony Schick, whose passion for journalism is unmatched. We used to joke that the two of us were like Woodward and Bernstein, but really he was both wrapped up into one package.
To Kevin O’Brien, a constant source of inspiration and laughs. Working with you this summer was definitely a highlight. You’re one of the most talented writers I have ever had the privilege of working with. In Tony’s words “your sensual eloquence makes readers blow a load.”
To Tom Miller, Susan English, and John Kafentzis, whose advice and copy editing skills I’ve sorely missed since I’ve graduated.
To Dave and Ben of Blazer’s Edge. You write my favorite blog on the Web, and seeing you link to my Pargo article was one of my biggest thrills of the summer.
To my parents, who have read every single one of my columns since I was in high school, and always encouraged me to try for new heights. It meant so much to me, because I couldn’t have done it without your love and support.
To my fiancĂ© Amanda, who listened over the phone as I read her the rough drafts of all my columns. Whenever I couldn’t find the right word to finish a thought, you could always find one for me. I can’t thank you enough for sticking by me despite all my madness.
And finally, I have to thank You, my readers. Your support and enthusiasm for my work continually inspired me to be my best. In the past, I had always joked that I had “about three or four” devoted readers, while secretly knowing that I had less than that. But these past few months, I was shocked at the response this blog was getting. Sure, compared to other blogs it was small, but to me, seeing people comment on articles or send me Facebook messages about a post meant the world. I couldn’t have done all of this without you, my readers. Thank you.
Now, if you’ve read this entire piece, then you’ll know that there’s no way I could ever tear myself away completely from my sportswriting. After all, it is a huge part of who I am. So I’ll still be around. I may not be here as often as I’ve been these past few months, but I’ll still be here. It just means that there may be a wider gap between posts. Still, I won’t let it change me, or what I’ve strived to do here since June. The circumstances may be changing, but it won’t change who I am.
I have no idea what the future has in store, but I look forward to seeing it all unfold as I enter the next phase in my life, and I hope you will all follow along with me. As my journalism professor Tom Miller says: "Stay tuned."
Thursday, September 24, 2009
Monday, September 21, 2009
The Brady-Kolber interview: How to create an awkward situation
By now everyone has seen the infamous video of ESPN sideline reporter Suzy Kolber vainly trying to catch a postgame interview with a disinterested Tom Brady after the Patriots defeated the Bills on Monday Night Football. What you may not know is what contributed behind the scenes to make that awkward situation happen.
In my years at GUTV, I had the opportunity to work as a sideline reporter on a few occasions (even despite my lack of blond hair or attractive features). I've also worked in the production trucks for sports telecasts with ESPN and KHQ (Spokane). And I can tell you, postgame interviews in a sports broadcast require the coordination of everybody - the reporter, the producer, the director, the athlete, and the play-by-play announcer. It's a tough situation, because if any one of those people screw up, the interview is ruined.
Let's take a look at the Kolber/Brady interview, and break it down Hubie Brown-style:
0:00 - All right, our analysis begins before the video even starts. In a live sports broadcast, the decision on who will be interviewed after the game is made by the producer with several minutes to go. The producer picks the player of the game, and informs sideline reporter, so he/she (in this case, she) can prepare her questions. The director is told of this decision, that way he knows who to search for with the dozens of cameras in the stadium. This decision is forwarded to the play-by-play announcer, who then will know how to segue into the interview. Ok, roll it.
0:02 - OK pause it! See, here we see Suzy Kolber approaching Tom Brady, obviously not having arranged the interview with him yet. Normally, in this situation, the director will have a camera spying Suzy and Tom the whole time, that way, once it's clear that Tom's ready to answer her questions, the director can cut to the 2-shot. The director jumped the gun, and showed Suzy following an oblivious Brady to a national audience. Roll it.
0:04 - Stop! Now someone else is leaving Kolber out to dry, and it's either the producer or the play-by-play man Mike Tirico. As we see that Kolber still doesn't have the interview yet, Tirico tosses it over to her anyway, saying "Suzy Kolber, live with Tom Brady! Take it away Suze!" What should normally happen here, is that, once the director confirms that Suzy is ready with Tom, the producer tells Tirico to toss it down. Either the producer told Tirico too early, or Tirico himself ran out of things to say and immediately sent it down.
0:10 - Now here's the next misstep. On live TV, we've turned on Suzy's microphone, where a national audience can hear her yelling "Tom! Tom!" and being ignored. This goes on for several excruciating seconds. This is on the director and producer. When they saw that Suzy still didn't have the interview, they could have bailed, cut her mic, and sent it back to Tirico. But instead, they stuck around to see what would happen next. So did the rest of us.
0:14 - After pretending to not hear Suzy, Tom finally attempts to brush her off by saying "I'm going in. I'm going in," and jogging toward the locker room. The next decision for Kolber is a catch-22 that will be broadcast live to millions of people. If she realizes that Tom won't talk and gives up, she'll be viewed as a weak sideline reporter, and her dissing will be seen across the country. But if she tried to play catch up and still get an interview, she'll be viewed as pestering Tom Brady. In the end, Suzy chooses option B. Again, we've been watching on national TV for a good 20 seconds and the situation is only getting more awkward. The director, rather than saying "go to camera 3," instead gets some popcorn and continues watching the train wreck.
0:21 - Tom keeps his stride and heads toward the locker room, saying that it's so loud that he can't hear the question. I don't want to put too much fault on Tom Brady at the beginning of this thing, because as it turns out he had already said earlier that day that he didn't want to be interviewed after the game. Plus, he had no way of knowing that this was all going out live. However, as she continued to ask the question, it dawned on him that this was live TV. Still instead of stopping for 5 seconds to spout a meaningless cliche, he still attempted to head toward the locker room, hoping that Suzy would give up. This part of the awkward situation falls on Tom Brady's shoulders.
0:32 - What a block of the cameraman! You don't draw it up any better that that! The cameraman is blocked! All he can do is give us a wide shot! Suzy's on her own! Can she pull it off???
0:35 - He said something! Something we've heard every athlete say a thousand times before!
So Suzy Kolber, ESPN, and the production staff, was it all worth it? 38 seconds of awkward, bad TV, in order to get nothing out of it (except comedy, of course).
Sideline reporting is a surprisingly tough, but often meaningless job, and every once in a while you get a situation like this. But in these situations it takes everyone working together to screw it up. The director, producer, and play-by-play man are all involved, but it's only the people on camera who take the flak. In this case, it was very much the production crew's fault as much as it was Suzy and Tom's.
In my years at GUTV, I had the opportunity to work as a sideline reporter on a few occasions (even despite my lack of blond hair or attractive features). I've also worked in the production trucks for sports telecasts with ESPN and KHQ (Spokane). And I can tell you, postgame interviews in a sports broadcast require the coordination of everybody - the reporter, the producer, the director, the athlete, and the play-by-play announcer. It's a tough situation, because if any one of those people screw up, the interview is ruined.
Let's take a look at the Kolber/Brady interview, and break it down Hubie Brown-style:
0:00 - All right, our analysis begins before the video even starts. In a live sports broadcast, the decision on who will be interviewed after the game is made by the producer with several minutes to go. The producer picks the player of the game, and informs sideline reporter, so he/she (in this case, she) can prepare her questions. The director is told of this decision, that way he knows who to search for with the dozens of cameras in the stadium. This decision is forwarded to the play-by-play announcer, who then will know how to segue into the interview. Ok, roll it.
0:02 - OK pause it! See, here we see Suzy Kolber approaching Tom Brady, obviously not having arranged the interview with him yet. Normally, in this situation, the director will have a camera spying Suzy and Tom the whole time, that way, once it's clear that Tom's ready to answer her questions, the director can cut to the 2-shot. The director jumped the gun, and showed Suzy following an oblivious Brady to a national audience. Roll it.
0:04 - Stop! Now someone else is leaving Kolber out to dry, and it's either the producer or the play-by-play man Mike Tirico. As we see that Kolber still doesn't have the interview yet, Tirico tosses it over to her anyway, saying "Suzy Kolber, live with Tom Brady! Take it away Suze!" What should normally happen here, is that, once the director confirms that Suzy is ready with Tom, the producer tells Tirico to toss it down. Either the producer told Tirico too early, or Tirico himself ran out of things to say and immediately sent it down.
0:10 - Now here's the next misstep. On live TV, we've turned on Suzy's microphone, where a national audience can hear her yelling "Tom! Tom!" and being ignored. This goes on for several excruciating seconds. This is on the director and producer. When they saw that Suzy still didn't have the interview, they could have bailed, cut her mic, and sent it back to Tirico. But instead, they stuck around to see what would happen next. So did the rest of us.
0:14 - After pretending to not hear Suzy, Tom finally attempts to brush her off by saying "I'm going in. I'm going in," and jogging toward the locker room. The next decision for Kolber is a catch-22 that will be broadcast live to millions of people. If she realizes that Tom won't talk and gives up, she'll be viewed as a weak sideline reporter, and her dissing will be seen across the country. But if she tried to play catch up and still get an interview, she'll be viewed as pestering Tom Brady. In the end, Suzy chooses option B. Again, we've been watching on national TV for a good 20 seconds and the situation is only getting more awkward. The director, rather than saying "go to camera 3," instead gets some popcorn and continues watching the train wreck.
0:21 - Tom keeps his stride and heads toward the locker room, saying that it's so loud that he can't hear the question. I don't want to put too much fault on Tom Brady at the beginning of this thing, because as it turns out he had already said earlier that day that he didn't want to be interviewed after the game. Plus, he had no way of knowing that this was all going out live. However, as she continued to ask the question, it dawned on him that this was live TV. Still instead of stopping for 5 seconds to spout a meaningless cliche, he still attempted to head toward the locker room, hoping that Suzy would give up. This part of the awkward situation falls on Tom Brady's shoulders.
0:32 - What a block of the cameraman! You don't draw it up any better that that! The cameraman is blocked! All he can do is give us a wide shot! Suzy's on her own! Can she pull it off???
0:35 - He said something! Something we've heard every athlete say a thousand times before!
So Suzy Kolber, ESPN, and the production staff, was it all worth it? 38 seconds of awkward, bad TV, in order to get nothing out of it (except comedy, of course).
Sideline reporting is a surprisingly tough, but often meaningless job, and every once in a while you get a situation like this. But in these situations it takes everyone working together to screw it up. The director, producer, and play-by-play man are all involved, but it's only the people on camera who take the flak. In this case, it was very much the production crew's fault as much as it was Suzy and Tom's.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
Blazers are partying like its 1995

That's right, Juwan Howard, star of the Michigan Fab Five teams of the early 90s, is officially a Blazer. No word yet on whether Jimmy King or Jalen Rose will be signed to the final roster spot.
Howard will be filling the Channing Frye role of "big man who can't rebound," albeit with less personality.
Today's signing got me thinking of the Blazer teams of the early 00s, who had a knack for signing aging superstars who were years past their prime. The Blazers of 2000-01 fielded a roster that included Scottie Pippen, Shawn Kemp, Rod Strickland, Detlef Schrempf, Damon Stoudamire, Stacy Augmon, and Steve Smith. All of them were great players ... before they joined the Blazers. By that year, they were either aging veterans with little left in the tank (Augmon, Strickland), on the downswing of their careers (Pippen, Stoudamire, Smith), or legendary examples of a superstar who wasted his talent (Kemp). I remember saying to my friends "man, imagine if this team was together in 1995? They would be unstoppable!"
The Howard signing today makes me realize just how many of the great mid-90s players played for the Blazers at one time or another. It's just too bad none of them played here at the top of their game.
That's why I'm pulling for a Juwan Howard Comeback Tour, 09-10!
Juwan, don't go quietly into that good night, like so many others before you! This is your chance to reassert yourself as the superstar you once were! Make the most of this final opportunity! Exclamation points!!!
The mid-90s will always be my most memorable era of the NBA. Growing up in the 90s, my friends and I collected so many basketball cards that I could look at a picture of a player from 15 years ago and tell you exactly who he was. Names like Grant Long, Carl Herrera, and Todd Day are still familiar to me (and yes, we still thought they sucked even back then). And to this day, I still have a soft spot for the superstars of the mid-90s. The leading scorers, the all-stars with cactus uniforms, the cast of NBA Jam for Super NES, those were the biggest names of an era.
Believe it or not, Juwan Howard is one of the few remaining links to the superstars of the mid-90s, even if he is a shell of the player he once was. There's only a handful of those players left in the league.
So Juwan Howard, I'm pulling for your comeback. Bring a little of that 90s talent back to the league as it approaches a new decade. Make every night Turn-Back-The-Clock Night, and give a little nostalgia to those of us who have an old book full of worthless 90s NBA trading cards. Do it for all the people who saw you team with Chris Webber and Gheorghe Muresan on the Bullets.
Better yet, why don't you bring back big Gheorghe with you? We could also get Muggsy Bougues, and Loy Vaught, and Jamal Mashburn, and Dino Radja, and Penny Hardaway, and Glenn Robinson, and ...
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
Weekly Sportscamp - September 16
-Fire Joe Morgan was back, and guest-edited Deadspin today. You won't have more fun reading someone deconstruct poorly-written sports columns. God, I missed these guys.
-Yesterday, ESPN columnists chose to rag on things I enjoy. Greg Easterbrook said The Dark Knight was an awful movie (some people just have no fun), and Paul Shirley, the musical connoisseur that he is, said The Beatles were "simple." Next week, Marc Stein makes a crack at freshly ironed shirts, and Jamele Hill compares Apple Pie to Japanese internment camps.
-Rumor has it that John Stockton's son, David, is walking-on to the Gonzaga men's basketball team. No word yet on whether this will make John actually smile for once.
-The Blazers signed Jeff Pendergraph to a three year deal. Pendergraph, if you remember, just underwent hip surgery and will be sidelined the entire 09-10 season. Years 2 and 3 are unguaranteed. Year 2 becomes guaranteed if Pendergraph plays in at least 10 games this season, something that is unlikely to happen. This is an example of the Blazers covering themselves in case the injury is worse than it appears, or as Paul Allen calls it "The Darius Miles Corollary."
-In sadder news, NCAA president Myles Brand passed away today after losing his fight with pancreatic cancer.
I was lucky enough to interview Mr. Brand once for a Gonzaga Bulletin article, and I was very surprised that he actually got back to me. This was the President of the entire NCAA, and yet he took the time to answer every one of my questions on the recent release of NCAA Graduation Success rates, a subject he seemed very proud of.
One of Brand's biggest goals was to improve the graduation rates of student-athletes, something he set out to do through the Academic Performance Program, which rewarded or punished schools based on graduation rates. It was his effort to let it be known that these student-athletes were there to do more than just play a sport, and that schools and the NCAA needed to do everything they could to help these young men and women graduate. He had set a goal of an 80 percent graduation rate for all Division-I athletes, and last fall the recent results showed that they had reached 79 percent.
At the time, Brand said he was pleased with the results, but not satisfied. He recognized that there was still work to be done with individual sports that were struggling, and that the NCAA shouldn't stop in this effort to help all of its student athletes succeed in the classroom.
He had the perfect mindset for student-athlete academic success, and a great vision. I hope that whoever takes over the job can continue the great things that Brand had started.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
The Beatles and Sports: Combining two loves
In honor of today's re-release of the entire Beatles catalogue on remastered CD, I thought I'd take a moment to pay tribute to the world's most famous band.
I grew up listening to The Beatles' music, and they have inspired my creativity on many occasions. During the past few years at Gonzaga working at GUTV, I managed to put a little Beatles influence into some of the sports coverage.
First up is the intro to GUTV's broadcast of Gonzaga women's basketball, set to the tune of - appropriately - "Hey Bulldog." I think it's a very underrated, rockin' song, and I had always wanted to use it in some fashion. With our basketball broadcasts, I finally got that opportunity.
Next up, the open for a Gonzaga Baseball broadcast, in which I used "Tomorrow Never Knows." The intro and first few bars of that song are so unique; it's in one chord the whole time, and yet The Beatles managed to get an incredible sound out of it. John Lennon's vocals are so haunting on it, and even though the song entirely wouldn't make sense in a baseball open, I knew I wanted some snippet of John's voice. I convinced play-by-play man Travis Lucian to include the word "shine" at the end of a sentence, and everything came together. The ominous tone of the song worked perfectly with the storyline of the game - the sense of desperation from the fading Bulldogs.
It just shows that The Beatles' music is universal; it even works perfectly with the sports teams of a private college in Washington.
I grew up listening to The Beatles' music, and they have inspired my creativity on many occasions. During the past few years at Gonzaga working at GUTV, I managed to put a little Beatles influence into some of the sports coverage.
First up is the intro to GUTV's broadcast of Gonzaga women's basketball, set to the tune of - appropriately - "Hey Bulldog." I think it's a very underrated, rockin' song, and I had always wanted to use it in some fashion. With our basketball broadcasts, I finally got that opportunity.
Next up, the open for a Gonzaga Baseball broadcast, in which I used "Tomorrow Never Knows." The intro and first few bars of that song are so unique; it's in one chord the whole time, and yet The Beatles managed to get an incredible sound out of it. John Lennon's vocals are so haunting on it, and even though the song entirely wouldn't make sense in a baseball open, I knew I wanted some snippet of John's voice. I convinced play-by-play man Travis Lucian to include the word "shine" at the end of a sentence, and everything came together. The ominous tone of the song worked perfectly with the storyline of the game - the sense of desperation from the fading Bulldogs.
It just shows that The Beatles' music is universal; it even works perfectly with the sports teams of a private college in Washington.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)